ECG Productions
A publishing footprint needs a response plan
The source reports 233 posts, 15 engagements and 362 views. This is a diagnostic baseline rather than an impact headline.
Prepared by SimplSolutions. Data: SimplAnalytics.
Jul 23 – Oct 20, 2026 / Compared with Apr 24 – Jul 22, 2026
views
engagements (New vs the previous 3 months)
posts published (17.9× vs the previous 3 months)
The starting point
Before this period, ECG Productions was publishing about 1 posts per week, averaging 0 engagements per post (Apr 24 – Jul 22, 2026).
The work
SimplSolutions published 233 posts across Instagram, X (Twitter), and TikTok, about 18.1 per week (up from 1 per week). Text posts performed best, averaging 0.2 engagements each, 2.0× the overall average. X (Twitter) drove 100% of all engagement. Posts published on Wednesdays earned the most engagement on average.
The comparison
Posts13 → 233
Engagements0 → 15
Views15 → 362
Gray: comparison total. Violet: results total. Each metric uses its own scale. Both comparison periods contain 90 days.
What to examine next
A useful next question.
Review platform coverage and creative response first. Keep approved campaign creative separate from evidence of performance.
How to read these results
Engagements are likes, comments and shares. Views are reported by each platform and do not represent unique reach. Per-view engagement rates use only posts that report views. Audience changes use the available follower history.
- Not enough follower history in the results period to measure audience growth.
- Our publishing log for X (Twitter), TikTok, and Instagram starts inside the comparison period, so posts before it are counted whoever published them.
- Only 27% of posts report views, so view totals understate reach.
- The results period runs through the last few days; the newest posts are still collecting engagement.
Metric snapshot: October 20, 2026. These are observational social metrics, not measured sales, revenue or a controlled causal test.