G&H Ortho
From quiet channels to a daily presence
Daily engagement rose sharply as the team expanded publishing. The tradeoff is visible: fewer engagements per post.
Prepared by BrainBytes Creative. Data: SimplAnalytics.
Aug 1 – Oct 7, 2026 / Compared with Feb 1 – Jul 31, 2026
content views (4.5× per day)
engagements (8.4× per day)
posts published
The starting point
The source study describes a near-dormant publishing schedule before August, with about four posts per month.
The work
The team moved to a consistent daily schedule across three channels. LinkedIn contributed 465 of 883 engagements, approximately 53% of the total.
The comparison
Posts23 → 199
Engagements279 → 883
Views17,304 → 29,261
Gray: comparison total. Violet: results total. Each metric uses its own scale. The periods differ in length. Growth multiples use daily totals; these bars show raw totals.
What to examine next
A useful next question.
Use this to discuss consistent presence and the role of LinkedIn, with the per-day adjustment attached.
How to read these results
Engagements are likes, comments and shares. Views are reported by each platform and do not represent unique reach. Per-view engagement rates use only posts that report views. Audience changes use the available follower history.
- Unequal periods: growth multiples use daily totals.
- Views reported on 87% of posts.
- Not enough follower history to measure audience growth.
Metric snapshot: October 8, 2026. These are observational social metrics, not measured sales, revenue or a controlled causal test.